News Investigators/ The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday fixed July 7 for definite hearing in a suit filed by Sen. Adolphus Wabara-led Board of Trustees (BoT) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
Justice Salim Ibrahim, who fixed the date to allow all parties file and respond to processes served on them, held that all pending applications and substantive suit would be taken together by the adjourned date.
Justice Ibrahim also ordered all the parties to file and serve their processes as agreed by July 6.
The judge, who held that the court would not entertain further delay of proceedings on the next adjourned date, adjourned the matter until July 7 for hearing of all applications, including the substantive suit.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Justice Ibrahim had, on June 19, ordered an accelerated hearing in the case.
The judge gave the order after counsel to the plaintiffs, Chief Gordy Uche, SAN, informed the court that the suit is time bound based on INEC’s revised timetable and schedule of activities for the 2027 general elections which gave July 17 as ultimatum.
Members of the Wabara-led BoT and the PDP had filed the fresh suit seeking an order of the court compelling INEC to recognise the Turaki-led interim National Working Committee (NWC) of the party in its official website.
The plaintiffs also sought an order directing the electoral umpire to, forthwith, update its records and publish on its official website the interim NWC of the party as forwarded to it by the plaintiffs and its National Executive Committee (NEC).
They said the names of members of the Kabir Turaki-led NWC was forwarded to the electoral umpire via their letters dated May 4.
NAN reports that the originating summons, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1159/2026, was filed on June 4 by a team of lawyers led by Chief Chris Uche, SAN.
The BoT members, who are plaintiffs in the suit, are ex-Senate President Adolphus Wabara; BoT Secretary, former Gov. Muazu Babangida Aliyu of Niger; ex-Minister of Information, Prof. Jerry Gana and PDP chieftain, Olabode George as 1st to 4th plaintiffs.
Others include former Minister of Women Affairs, Hajiya Maryam Ciroma; also an ex-Minister of Women Affairs and Social Development, Hajiya Zainab Maina; member of BoT and NEC, Dame Esther Uduehi and PDP as 5th to 8th plaintiffs respectively.
They sued INEC as sole defendant in the suit.
On Tuesday’s proceeding, Mr Turaki, who is the National Chairman of PDP (8th plaintiff), and Prof. Jerry Gana (3rd plaintiff) were in court.
When the case was called, Gordy Uche, SAN, announced appearance for all the plaintiffs while Mr Sunday Ameh, SAN, also announced his appearance for 8th plaintiff (PDP).
Addressing the court, Uche informed the court that on the last adjourned date, he was ready for the hearing of the matter when he was confronted with applications by parties seeking to be joined in the case.
He said he had responded to the applications accordingly and was ready for the hearing of the suit.
Uche, therefore, applied that all the applications, including their substantive suit, should be taken together and ruling and judgment delivered.
He said this would save the judicial time and enable his clients meet with the INEC’s timetable for submission of names of candidates for the 2027 elections.
The lawyer said that the commission had reiterated that its “July 11 for the submission of names of candidates is sacrosanct.”
“They said the submission started yesterday and parties have been given access code and we also need the access code too,” Uche said.
He, therefore, prayed the court to grant his application and appealed to lawyers to other parties to also reason with him.
“It is a passionate appeal we are making,” he said.
Ameh, who also appeared for 8th plaintiff; O. A. Adeyemi, counsel for INEC; Chief Fedinard Orbih, SAN, who represented parties seeking to be joined as 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants and Adedayo Adedeji, SAN, who also appeared for applicants seeking to join as defendants, did not oppose Uche’s application.
Justice Ibrahim consequently adjourned the matter until July 7 for hearing of all applications and the substantive suit.
NAN reports that the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja had, on June 3, set aside key aspects of an Ibadan Federal High Court judgement that recognised a factional caretaker committee in the PDP.
The appellate court held that the trial court granted reliefs that were never sought by any of the parties to the suit.
Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, in a unanimous judgement, faulted Justice Uche Agomoh of the Federal High Court, Ibadan, for going beyond the issues placed before the court in a dispute arising from the PDP leadership crisis.
Justice Agomoh had, in a judgment delivered on Jan. 30, recognised the caretaker committee led by Abdurahman Mohammed and Samuel Anyanwu of Nyesom Wike’s camp, as the legitimate leadership faction of the party.
However, the Court of Appeal held that none of the parties before the lower court had sought such a declaration.
Meanwhile, the Wabara-led BoT of the PDP, in the suit filed on June 4, sought a declaration that INEC was constitutionally bound to enforce and give full effect to the decision of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja in a suit between Sen. Sameul Anyanwu vs. Amb. Umar Damagun and eight others delivered on Jan. 12.
They sought a declaration that the commission is also bound by decisions in the appeal between PDP and two others Vs. Austine Nwachukwu and eight others.
The appeal was delivered on March 9 and appeal numbers: SC/CV/164/2026 between PDP Vs. Alhaji Sule Lamido and four others and SC/CV/166/2026 between PDP and two others Vs. Hon Austine Nwachukwu and eight others both delivered on April 30.
They, therefore, prayed the court for an order directing INEC to accept and give effect to all official correspondences concerning the party from the interim NWC and for the commission to direct the same emanating from it to the NWC as forwarded to it by the plaintiffs and the NEC vide their letters dated May 4.
In the affidavit in support of the originating summons deposed to by ex-Gov. Aliyu, he said on Nov. 1, 2025, “key officers of PDP (8th plaintiff) like Sen. Anyanwu, Hon Umar M. Bature, Adeyemi Kamaldeen Ajibade and Barr. Okechukwu Osuoha were suspended by a resolution of the NWC for gross misconduct, anti-party activities and insubordination against the 8th plaintiff.”
Aliyu said that at the 608 meeting of the NWC held on Nov. 1, 2025, their suspension was approved and they were referred to National Disciplinary Committee (NDC) for further action.
He said the affected four members deliberately refused, failed and neglected to submit themselves to the party’s NDC and continue to act as officers of the party even when there was no any resolution lifting their suspension.
He said that Anyanwu was earlier recommended for expulsion as a member of the PDP by a report dated March 10, 2025 submitted by the NDC.
Aliyu said, subsequently, the NDC’s recommendation for the expulsion of Anyanwu was upheld at the 608 meeting of the NWC held on Nov. 1, 2025.
He said upon his expulsion, Anyanwu filed suit number: CV/1050/2025 against Damagun and others at the FCT High Court, challenging his exputsion as a member of the party.
He averred that on Jan. 12, the FCT High Court delivered its judgment, dismissing Anyanwu’s claim in the said suit on the merit.
The ex-governor said the BoT, at its emergency meeting held on Nov. 5, 2025, constituted the board reconcilaton committee, preparatory to its national elective convention.
He said the party held its elective national conventon on Nov. 15 and Nov. 16, 2025 and elected its natonal officers.
According to him, the convention was subject of several litigations that went through the Federal High Court to the Supreme Court.
Aliyu said the convention was nullified by the Court of Appeal in appeal number: CA/A8)/1613/2025, between PDP and two others Vs. Hon Austine Nwachukwu and eight others delivered on March 9.
He said the judgment of the appellate court referred to also affirmed the suspension of the key officers of the PDP referred to in paragraph 11 by virtue of the resolution of the party’s NWC.
He said on further appeal to the Supreme Court, the apex court, in its judgment between PDP Vs. Alhaji Sule Lamido and four others and SC/CV/166/2026, between PDP and two others Vs. Austine Nwachukwu and eight others, both delivered on April 30 also affirmed the Appeal Court judgment, nullifying the convention of the PDP held on Nov. 15 and Nov. 16, 2025.
In addition, he said the apex court judgment further dismissed the cross appeal, challenging the suspension of the key officers of the party mentioned in paragraph 11 supra.
Aliyu said the resolution of the NWC dated Nov. 1, 2025, upon which the suspension of A. K. Ajibade, SAN, was affirmed by the Court of Appeal and cross appeal against the same to the Supreme Court was dismissed, suspended A. K. Ajibade, SAN, alongside Anyanwu, Bature and Osuoha.
He said the constitution of the interim NWC was communicated to INEC by the party’s BOT and NEC through their letters dated May 4 .
The former governor said, consequently, the NWC, at its meeting heid on May 12, assigned portfolios to members of the interim NWC as constituted by its BoT and NEC, as was forwarded to the commission vide Exhibits “9” and “10” respectively.
He said the electoral umpire was subsequently notified of the assignment of the portfolios by the interim NWC’s letter dated May 15.
Aliyu, however, said that inspite of the receipt of Exhibits “9” and “10” dated May 4 and Exhibit “11” dated May 15, written to INEC by the BoT, NEC and NWC, the defendant failed, refused and neglected to effect the necessary corrections in its records or accord recognition to the interim National Working Committee.”
He said upon the non-compliance with the letters, further letters were written through the party’s lawyer, Chief Uche, on May 8 and May 13, urging INEC to give effect to subsisting judgment of the courts.
“That the defendant has consistently failed and refused to obey and give effect to the decisions of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court by effecting the necessary corrections in its record.
The ex-governor said he knew for a fact that INEC is under a constitutional and legal obligation to comply with valid and subsisting judgments of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
He described INEC’s actions as “a grave affront to the rule of law and the supremacy of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).”
According to him, that unless this honourable court intervenes, the defendant will continue to disregard the valid and subsisting judgments of the courts.
Aliyu said it was in the interest of justice for the court to grant the reliefs sought in the originating summons.
NAN
