HomeJudiciaryAlleged Cyberbullying: Court Threatens To Commit Sowore’s Lawyer For Contempt

Alleged Cyberbullying: Court Threatens To Commit Sowore’s Lawyer For Contempt

News Investigators/ The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Monday, threatened to commit Marshall Abubakar, the lead defence lawyer to Sahara Reporters’ publisher, Omoyele Sowore, for contempt over act of misconduct in court.

The development occurred after Mr Abubakar raised his voice before Justice Mohammed Umar.

Justice Umar then ordered Sowore’s lawyer to “come out and kneel down” in open court.

Other lawyers, however, quickly prevailed upon the judge to forgive Mr Abubakar.

Mr Sowore is being prosecuted by the Department of State Services (DSS) for allegedly making false claims against President Bola Tinubu.

The lawyer drew the ire of the judge when he raised his voice while making submissions in court.

The Mr Abubakar further raised his voice and insisted that the date chosen by the court for the defence to open its case was not convenient for him.

The drama started after Mr Abubakar concluded the cross-examination of the only prosecution witness.

The prosecuting lawyer, Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, then announced the closure of their case and applied that the defence be called upon to open its case.

When the judge asked Mr Abubakar when they planned to open their defence, the lawyer said the defendant would make a no-case submission and suggested that the court should adjourn till a date in July.

Responding, Kehinde objected and argued that it was part of the defence’s dilatory tactics intended to further delay proceedings.

He suggested that the case be heard on a daily basis.

In his intervention, the judge said that while the prosecution was swift in conducting its case, the defence was tardy, spending a whole four days in cross examining the prosecution’s only witness.

The judge said it was not feasible to hear the case on a daily basis, but directed parties to return on April 13 for the adoption of their final written addresses in respect of the no-case submission.

Abubakar seemed uncomfortable with that date.

While Sowore was addressing the judge from the witness box on how the proposed date might affect his party’s upcoming primaries, his lawyer also simultaneously began addressing the judge, narrating how his client was poised to wrestle power from President Tinubu.

“This court belongs to all of us. This court is not for some people alone. It belongs to all of us,” Abubakar yelled.

Attempts by the judge to make the lawyer lower his voice were unsuccessful.

Reacting, Justice Umar said, “If you shout in this court again, I will commit you for contempt. In fact, come here! Come and kneel down here!” pointing to a spot in front of the courtroom.”

On realising the unsavoury turn of events, other lawyers, led by the prosecuting counsel, jumped to their feet and began to beg the judge to forgive the lawyer.

While the lawyers were still upstanding begging, the judge pronounced that the case had been adjourned till April 13 for adoption, and rose for the day.

Earlier, when the case was called in the morning, Kehinde told the court that Sowore had a recording device with him in the dock.

He urged the court to direct that the device be taken from the defendant.

Sowore, who the judge granted permission to speak, denied being in possession of any recording device, adding that he only had with him his eye glasses, power bank and phone.

Justice Umar recalled that the court had earlier made an order that the defendant should not bring any gadget with him while in the dock.

The judge then asked him to submit the items to his lawyers, which he handed to a court official, who transferred them to Sowore’s lawyer.

When asked to proceed with the case, Abubakar claimed to have only learnt about Monday’s sitting few moments before the court’s session began.

Abubakar said he was not in court with the case file, because he was in another court for a separate case.

He then applied for a stand down till 12. 30 pm to enable him retrieve the file from his office.

Although Kehinde objected, arguing that it was a ploy by the defence to further delay proceedings, the judge granted the stand down.

When proceedings resumed a little to 1pm, Abubakar cross-examined the sole prosecution witness, Cyril Nosike, a DSS official, for about two hours.

Abubakar also tendered copies of newspaper publications, some of which he later gave to the witness to read from.

NAN

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -sponsored

Most Popular

Recent Comments

This is our collective consensus , no retreat no surrender ,all elections results must be transmitted at real time enough of taking us for morons in their cages , on Electronic Transmission Without Mandatory `Real-time’ Provision Is Useless – Coalition
This is our collective consensus , no retreat no surrender ,all elections results must be transmitted at real time enough of taking us for morons in their cages , on Electronic Transmission Without Mandatory `Real-time’ Provision Is Useless – Coalition
Whoever is responsible for all of this must have to go. on Delay In Wage Award Payment Arrears No Longer Acceptable – Civil Servants