Saturday, November 1, 2025
HomePoliticsAlleged Anti-Party: PDP Suspends Anyanwu, Ajibade, Organising Secretary For 1 Month

Alleged Anti-Party: PDP Suspends Anyanwu, Ajibade, Organising Secretary For 1 Month

News Investigators/ The National Working Committee (NWC) of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has suspended the party’s National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, for one month over alleged anti-party activities.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the party’s National Legal Adviser, Kamaldeen Ajibade, National Organising Secretary, Umaru Bature, and Deputy Legal Adviser, Okechukwu Osuoha, were also suspended for the same alleged offence.

The PDP National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, announced the suspension of the top national officers while addressing newsmen after the emergency meeting of the NWC on Saturday in Abuja.

NAN reports that the suspension was coming barely 24 hours after a Federal High Court in Abuja ordered the suspension of the party’s national convention scheduled for Nov. 15 to Nov. 16 in Ibadan.

Mr Ologunagba said that the suspension was in pursuant to the provisions of Sections 58 and 59 of the PDP Constitution (as amended in 2017).

He said that the national officers were suspended for a period of one month and referred to the National Disciplinary Committee for further action.

Mr Ologunagba said that the NWC met and reviewed the party’s activities, particularly the recent development, including party members involving in anti-party activities.

He recalled that the party had, on Aug. 8, issued reprimands to members over anti-party activities which were spelt out in Section 58 of the PDP Constitution.

Mr Ologunagba said that the section specifically refers to ‘anybody who commits any breach of the party’s constitution, any member who says or does anything likely to bring the party into disrepute, hatred or contempt, disobeys or neglects to carry out lawful directives, of the party, or any organ, or officer of the party’.

He said that the section specifically emphasised on ‘any member who engages in any conduct likely to cause disaffection among members of the party, or is likely to disrupt the peaceful, lawful and efficient conduct of the business of the party’.

“So, the NWC considered this, with other actions, in line with the constitution of the party and came to these following decision:

“One, the National Legal Adviser, Ajibade suspended for 30 days, and is referred to the national disciplinary committee of the party.

“Two, the Deputy National Legal Adviser, Osuoha, was suspended for 30 days, in line with the constitution, and referred to the National Disciplinary Committee, as may be necessary.

“Three, the National Organising Secretary, Bature, suspended for one month, and referred to the national disciplinary committee.

Third, the National Secretary, Anyanwu, suspended for one month, and referred to the national disciplinary committee,” he said.

Mr Ologunagba said that during the period of the suspension, the affected officers would cease to function in their respective capacities.

“In the case of the national secretary, Pursuant to Section 36(2) of the PDP Constitution, the Deputy National Secretary, Setonji Koshoedo shall act as the national secretary.

“In the case of the national legal adviser and the deputy national legal adviser, the national director of legal services was directed to oversee the activities of the department,” he said.

Asked why the suspended members were not at the NWC meeting, Ologunagba said that the party’s National Chairman, Umar Damagum, who was present at the meeting, had the constitutional power to summon the NWC meeting.

“This is an emergency meeting and under Section 29 of the constitution of the party, the chairman conveys the meeting.

“The meeting was properly called, and then people are here, and that decision has been taken,” he said.

Mr Ologunagba restated that the party would continue with its scheduled national convention in spite the Friday court verdict.

“We’re a party that respects the rule of law. We will always obey court orders. We have done that in the past.

“However, the court didn’t say the party should stop existing. The process of the party will continue. So, that is what we communicated.

“We are disappointed with the judgment. However, as a party, we will continue our processes,” he said.

NAN

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments